Katonian Press - When Americans head out to their polling place today to exercise their right to vote, they may find a new way to cast their ballot. Voting machines: meet "Web 2.0".
In response to continuing controversy surrounding electronic voting machines in the United States, private groups have stepped up to attempt to solve the problem that government and big business cannot. Leading the charge is young Internet entrepreneur Kevin Rose, former television host on the now defunct TechTV and, perhaps more famously, founder of the popular social news site Digg.com.
Tapping the collective wisdomBuilding on the success of Digg, Kevin Rose announced earlier this year that he would be investing a good chunk of the venture capital he has raised into creating the "next big thing" in electronic voting. The basic concept is a system where voters can submit candidates and initiatives which can then be "dugg" (voted for) or "buried" (voted against) by other voters across the country. Candidates which are dugg float to the top and receive more exposure, whereas those that are buried remain in obscurity and may be flagged to inform other voters why they have been voted against. Reasons for burying a candidate include such options as "Duplicate Candidate", "Wrong Party", "Inaccurate Campaign Promises", and "OK, this candidate is lame". "It's a self-policing Democracy," says Rose. "And best of all, you can vote for who you like, and demote the guys that suck."
The feature list for these new voting machines is small but powerful. Candidates can be sorted by party, most diggs, and recently popular. In addition, voters can add "bedfellows" (essentially a "friends list" of other voters) and see which candidates and issues they have dugg. Most controversial, though, is the main ballot to the voting interface that highlights a number of individuals and initiatives selected automatically by a complex algorithm based mainly on their digg count and who has dugg them.
A sophisticated anti-gaming processThe system for promoting candidates has come under fire numerous times during the development of the Digg voting machines used in earlier local elections and primaries. In previous versions, strange write-in candidates ("Pee Wee Herman", "Abraham Lincoln", the socialist candidate) would sometimes appear on the main ballot. The algorithm was tweaked numerous times, but not to the complete satisfaction of the voting public. Some individuals noted that a large majority of the candidates were making their way on to the ballot through the diggs of a small minority of the community that all voted together. Critics argued that small, active groups were gaming the system, voting along the same lines as their bedfellows to promote candidates and issues, and dominating the elections. Members of this elite group shot back that they were working hardest for America and were being backstabbed for their efforts to combat terrorism. More changes to the algorithm were implemented to combat these concerns (essentially giving more weight to candidates with a variety of voters behind them, and somewhat less weight to those who are voted on by groups of bedfellows) but these changes angered some in the community. Top electronic voter "KR0ve" (whose full e-voting username is the unpronouncable "KR0ve666GW78GHW80WC82PG8284RR84WC86GB92GWB0004pl4me") penned an angry and juvenile letter in response to the changes claiming he resisted using other voting systems in the past because he believed in Rose's solution, but that he'd be returning to paper ballets after being "urinated on" by the voting system's founder.
Abortions for some, miniature American flags for othersAlthough only a small number of voters are likely to openly embrace the new Digg machines, their success (or failure) will either usher in a new era of involvement in our democratic process, or reaffirm the value of the tried and true way of doing things. With Democrats looking to steal congress, and the Republicans hoping to stay the course, voting irregularities are likely to are likely to be the source of consternation for months to come, regardless of party.
As for me... I'm voting for Kodos.