Why so serious?
by Kato @ 5:08 PM
Help Wanted signDriving to work a few weeks ago a new sign caught my eye. Seeing as how I drive the same way every day, changes in the landscape tend to attract my attention, although I'll freely admit that I'm on autopilot most of the way. The sign I passed read the following:

HELP WANTED
TARD

Now, of course, my mind immediately flooded with thoughts, not the least of which was "I totally need to blog this", but that occurs so frequently now it hardly bears mentioning. My initial reaction was, "I wonder what work they need done that is specifically suited to the talents of a retarded person?" A valid question, don't you think? The second thing that came to mind was why they chose to just write "tard" instead of "retard" or "mentally handicapped person". I dunno, I've never had one of those signs, maybe they follow the razor/razorblade model where the board is cheap but the letters cost an arm and a leg or something. Or maybe they're Southern, who knows. Anyway, it was only after several more questions and thoughts ran through my head that it dawned on me, hey, it's probably not a good idea (or very polite) to use a deragatory term like that on a Help Wanted sign. I mean, you don't see kitchens in need of a dishwasher announcing, "Help Wanted: Beaner".* Shows you how desensitised I've become concerning the English language (blame rap music, if you must). But, on the other hand, at least you know what you are getting into when you apply for a job there.

I drove by the same sign today, and got a better look. It says "YARD" not "TARD". Guess we all know what that makes me.

Nearsighted.

What, did you think I was going to say retarded? Grow up.

* WITFITS and its parent company, The Katonian Corporation, would like to apologize for any insensitive comments made by Kato in this column. The views of this blogger do not reflect the views of WITFITS nor the views of The Katonian Corporation. In fact, we love Mexicans, and their tasty tacos, burritos, and fried ice cream. As for Southerners, the jury is still out on them.

Tags: , ,
David CrosbyKato's Brain: Wait a minute, what was that?
Gladys: What, sir?
Brain: That. What did we just see?
Gladys: Honestly, I wasn't watching. You don't pay me to do that job.
Brain: I don't pay you at all.
Gladys: That's why I don't feel guilty about sneaking endorphins when you aren't looking.
Brain: Hmmm. We'll discuss that later. Get me the Visual Cortex.
Visual Cortex: This is visual, "You see it, we... something it" Well, I haven't really worked out the rest of the rhyme yet. How can I help you?
Brain: I need a replay of the last 30 seconds. What did we see?
Visual Cortex: Okay, I'm pulling up the feed from Short Term. Let's see, we're walking, we're walking, we're walking... carpet... some guy... bathroom door... urinal... our impressive--
Brain: Stop there. Go back. Who did we pass?
Visual Cortex: According to the guys in Facial Recognition, David Crosby.
Gladys: (aside) This should be good.
Brain: David Crosby?
Visual Cortex: Yes.
Brain: The singer/songwriter?
Visual Cortex: Yes.
Brain: Of Crosby, Still, Nash (and Young)?
Visual Cortex: According to a cross-reference with Data Access and Retrieval, yes.
Brain: Long hair, kinda curly?
Visual Cortex: Yes.
Brain: Overweight?
Visual Cortex: Well...
Brain: Prominent moustache?
Visual Cortex: Umm, it's hard to tell from the footage Iris and Ira sent us. We really only saw him from the back.
Brain: Gray hair?
Visual Cortex: Not exactly.
Brain: So what you're saying is, we may or may not have passed the back of David Crosby's head?
Visual Cortex: Maybe.
Brain: Or rather, David Crosby's head from 30 years ago.
Visual Cortex: Possibly.
Brain: And does that make sense to you? That David Crosby, at some point in his history, went on a diet, shaved his moustache, and jumped forward thirty years into the future to appear in the lobby of a research building in Ohio?
Visual Cortex: Uhh, you don't pay me to make those kinds of judgements.
Brain: I don't pay you at all.
Gladys: We already made that joke.
Brain: Well, whatever, we'll just chalk that one up to something we ate I guess. Heh, it was kinda funny though, don't you think?
Gladys: If you say so. I'm more of a Simon and Garfunkle fan.
Brain: Hey, you know, these kinds of things happen to us a lot. Maybe we should start writing what happens to us down.
Gladys: To what end, sir?
Brain: Well, because I bet other people would think it's funny. We could be famous. What are all the kids doing these days... "podcatching"?
Gladys: Casting.
Brain: Right! We could have our own podcast. We'd be like... like Seinfeld, only inside someone's head!
Gladys: I don't think so, sir.
Brain: Why not?
Gladys: Because, although Seinfeld was ostensibly the show about nothing, in reality it explored the lives of four friends who, although selfish and amoral, found themselves vexed by the complications that inevitably arose when they attempted to do the right thing. Additionally, the endless minutiae of every day life examined in each episode served to reflect the lives of real people, as opposed to the unrealistic archetypes found in most modern situation comedies.
Brain: And?
Gladys: You're an anthropomorphized brain.
Brain: I see.
Gladys: Also, Seinfeld was funny.
Brain: Point taken. You know, if I actually paid you something, I'd have to dock your pay for comments like that. Good thing you work cheap, ha!
Gladys: I rest my case.

Tags: , ,
by Kato @ 10:28 AM
A crab with a speech bubble that says 'I pinch'The new Honda Element commercials with the crab talking to the car crack me up. I don't know what it is, exactly; there is something inexplicably funny to me about talking crabs, particularly when they are fixated on pinching.

Genius.

Tags: , , , ,
An analog clock reading 9:00You know you've developed a reputation when you get in early for a change and your boss pokes their head inside your office, looks at the clock, and then looks at you, saying, "What the hell is wrong with you?"






Tags: , ,
by Kato @ 8:42 PM
Patrick Stewart as Captain Picard from Star Trek The Next GenerationWould it surprise you to hear that I have had a tune stuck in my head for about two weeks now? It's not like that happens often. This time it is DarkMateris's The Picard Song.

It amuses me so, particularly the bit about his rambling professor (I also dig the Shakespeare).

Make it so.





Tags: , , , ,
Picture of the statue 'Monument to Pro-Life: The Birth of Sean Preston'I... I don't know what to say. My brain doesn't know how to handle this. I literally can't conjure the cognitive faculties to process this information. If you could see my face, you'd no doubt see my brow furrowed in a vain attempt to comprehend the situation. I'd say I'm speechless, but ask anyone who knows me, I've never been speechless a day in my life.

What is it, you ask? Why it's a statue of a nude Britney Spears on a bearksin rug giving birth to her child, of course.

Nude-centric week of WITFITS, I know. I wish I could say it was a good thing.

Now I, like most straight men in America, would like to see Britney Spears nude. There's no grand mystery behind this. We are men. She is a hot young woman. It's pretty simple. Of course, she was hot, but now I'm not so sure. Anyway, I'm straying from my point. Which is that Britney was hot and yes, we all wanted to see her naked (you girls know you are curious, too).

But not like this, dear god, not like this.

I'm not saying that pregant women can't be sexy. Sure they can. But not on all fours, creepily stroking the ears of a dead bear, with their legs spread wide enough to see the head of their soon-to-be-born child crowning. Sure, men have vivid imaginations, but I'm pretty sure that's a scenario that has never played out in anyone's imagination. Well, no, I guess I'm wrong there. Clearly this guy imagined it, and then realized it in Plaster of Paris.

Congratulations, sir. You have just ruined countless erections. You, sir, are the Hillary Clinton of sculptors.

Tags: ,
Two white silhouetted figures listening to portable MP3 players on a field of blueOne of the big trends on the InterWeb in the past year has been the rise of the podcast. For those of you who don't consume new technology as if it were life-giving manna like myself, a podcast is a web feed of audio or video files placed on the Internet for anyone to download or subscribe [WikiPedia]. I listen to a couple right now, including This Week in Tech ("Revenge of the Screensavers") and Inside the Net with Amber MacArthur.

Before I go any further, I must get something off my chest. I object to the term podcast, for two very simple reasons:
  1. The name comes from the association with playing MP3's on an Apple iPod. I do not own an iPod. I listen to these shows on my PC, on a burned CD, or more often than not on my RIO MP3 player. There is nothing inherent in the technology, format, or delivery system that ties them solely to an iPod. That would be like calling my bag of Schwebels in the fridge "toaster bread". And I certainly don't go around referring to my penis as... you know what, I'm just going to stop there. Anyway, podcast is a biased name. Audiocast would be more appropriate, but then they didn't ask me when they were naming it (probably because they've heard my penis comments).
  2. This concept is nothing new, though it is sometimes treated as if no one thought of it before last year. Audio programs have been available on the web for years now, in both streaming and downloadable form. The only difference now is that enough technologies (i.e. mainstream portable audio players and convenient syndication/delivery in the form of RSS) have come together to make both content creation and content consumption available to the masses. But now, everything is labelled as a "podcast" even though it's still just the same old audio programming that's been around for years. Give something a name and the media latches on to it, I guess.

Don't get me wrong, I think podcasting is pretty cool, after all that is why I'm sitting here typing this post. Everyone these days seems to have a podcast. Even Gabe and Tycho over at Penny Arcade have started toying with the idea. And so I've asked myself more than once: should I have a podcast?

I won't deny that the idea has a sort of lustrous quality that attracts me to it with the power of all things shiny. I have certainly thought that it might be interesting to record audio versions of some of my posts, but is there any value in that? Would someone want to listen to something they could just as easily read? On the other hand, acting out some of the "Inside My Head" posts does sound sorta fun, though I'm not sure I can come up with that many voices. I could conceivably go another route and write content exclusively for a podcast that isn't just a reading of what's on the blog. I certainly don't want to sit around and wax about news stories like a lot of 'casts, and I would want it to be humorous and entertaining. Perhaps comedy sketches, like that Dead Alewives one about Dungeons & Dragons, that would be pretty sweet. Of course, video podcast ("vodcasts") are on the rise as well, for those that have the equipment and bandwidth. How cool would it be to write a few scripts and film a mini-sitcom (podcom?)

But then again, there is the whole "requires additional free time" issue. As it is, I struggle to make sure I get 5 posts a week on the blog, pouring time into auxiliary content might cause the other content to suffer. Plus, audio/video production (let alone writing) is not exactly something you can do when you have a few spare minutes on your hand. Nevertheless, the idea has been bouncing around in my head for awhile, and I've been craving a meaty project to dive into. Of course, I say that about once a month, every time I come across something new and exciting that piques my interest. I get all excited and then I realize how much damn work anything fun is and it sorta fades into the background.

So, what are your thoughts, oh wise and powerful witfitters? Will the world ever see a day where my soothing geek voice fills the airwaves? Does the world even want to see a day like that?

Tags: ,
by Kato @ 8:05 PM
The words 'Kato Katonian witfits.blogspot.com' spelled out with naked bodiesLet's face it, there's really only one thing the Internet does well: deliver porn. Sure you can send e-mails, play games, read news, blah blah blah, but porn, that's what's really driving this technological juggernaut. But, unfortunately, businesses and schools seem to frown upon their employees/students surfing for pornographic material on their time. It's such a shame, because sometimes you really just need to indulge that Half-Naked Women Baking Double Fudge Brownies fetish of yours. Well, some enterpreneuring webians have put their photoshopping skills to work in order to deliver us Work Safe Pr0n.

Of course, having said that, you probably shouldn't follow any of these links at work. And if you're prudish, well, you're probably not reading this god-forsaken blog anyway, but maybe you should skip these links, just this once.

Check out the "Not Quite Pornography Corner" (from 1998, an oldie but a goodie), or the more recent Something Awful Comedy Goldmine: "Make Porn Work Safe".

Have you ever wondered what your name might look like if it were spelled out by naked people? I have! I wonder it all the time! Today, my curiousity was finally sated when I stumbled across a page that does exactly that. Type in your name and see it spelled out in naked people.

In other news, fake Euro notes featuring naked women and men are being passed off as real cash in, where else, Germany. I particularly like the European Union logo represented as a heart.

Finally, in this flesh-peddling edition of WITFITS, a judge ordered Google to provide search results to the Department of Justice in accordance with the DoJ's recently filed subpoena. How is this apropos, you might ask. Well, a careful look at the decision reveals a footnote in which one finds the words "teabagging" and "pearl necklace". You can't tell me that isn't funny.

Tags: ,
Still from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade showing Indiana and his father tied to a chairClass, today we are going to talk about interpersonal communication. We will be addressing the subject of the Conversational Dismount, and the difficulties some people suffer in managing it.

Conversational Dismount is a term I have coined (or appropriated to my own uses, I'm not sure anymore) to describe the manner in which a conversation ends. Though we are living in the days of text-messaging, Leetspeak, and multitasking, personal verbal interaction still retains a modicum of formality that lends structure and serves as a template for how correspondence should be conducted. Conversations, in general, have a beginning, middle, and an end, all of which bear some trivial protocol that is (or should be) nearly universally understood. Most conversations start with a greeting or a question, continue on for an unspecified (but finite) amount of time, and then end with a closing salutation or other situationally appropriate language that delineates the conclusion. This structure allows conversations to be discrete entities with a fixed beginning and end, a format we humans find pleasing.

And why, you ask, are we even discussing something that should be obvious to anyone with even rudimentary vocal skills? Because when this structure is forfeited, the world as we know it plunges into chaos. Mock me if you will, but I have firsthand experience of the ruin it can bring.

The Vanishing Act
I once knew an individual who wantonly disregarded the time-honored format of the standard English conversation. This person treated interaction as if it were a spontaneous and nebulous activity which could literally start and finish at any moment. When speaking with them, they would frequently start talking in a stream-of-consciousness manner, the first thing out of their mouth being whatever it was that found itself bouncing around their mind at that exact moment. This habit also meant that they frequently interrupted ongoing conversations without any regard to etiquette, though that phenomenon is somewhat off topic. Just as a conversation could start randomly at any moment, so too could one end just as abruptly. Without warning or premeditation, this person would simply walk away, sometimes with my words still being spoken or hanging in the air. I kid you not, on more than one occasion I was speaking with them, looked away, and looked back to find them gone. Our conversational dismount, as it were, was abrupt and practically non-existent. They were the conversation equivalent of a ninja (or to use a modern parallel, the American Delta Forces). Batman is a famous employer of this "technique".

The Night of A Thousand Goodbyes
At the other end of the spectrum is a situation similar to the Salutation Loop Phenomenon (or rather a specific application thereof). In phone calls with my father I routinely find that, at the end of the call, we cannot negotiate an appropriate conversational dismount. He is a polite man who raised me to be polite as well, but as such we routinely find ourselves in a game of etiquette chicken, stuck in a salutation loop at the end of a call. In the case of the individual above the problem involved having no closure whatsoever. In this case, it's an indefinite closer, a dismount that never actually dismounts. Here is a theoretical transcript:

Kato, the lesser: Alright, Dad, I gotta go.
Kato, the greater: Okay, we'll be talkin' to ya.
Kato, the lesser: Sounds good. You take care.
Kato, the greater: You too. I'll see you, I guess, when I see ya.
Kato, the lesser: Yup, have a good evening.
Kato, the greater: You too. Have a good week, don't work to hard.
Kato, the lesser: I'll try not to, tell Mom I love her.
Kato, the greater: I will, stay outta trouble.
Kato, the lesser: I'll see what I can do. Have a good one.
Kato, the greater: Yup, stay warm.
Kato, the lesser: You too. Alright, goodnight, Dad.
Kato, the greater: Okay, we'll be talkin' to ya...

This can go on for twenty minutes before I eventually decide to break the cycle and simply hang up the phone, forcing myself to consciously stifle the instinct to reply with one last pleasantry. I have attempted to point out the fact that we clearly suffer some type of dismount dysfunction but apparently my father is in too deep and doesn't even realize what is happening. I fear that with each call we come closer and closer to the point of no return, a cycle that cannot be broken, a recursive salutation loop the likes of which no man has ever seen. My only salvation lies in Cingular, who is guaranteed to drop the call at some point without fail. I only hope it isn't too late.

Parents, teach your children about the Conversational Dismount, before someone